Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:51 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 11:06 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00940433
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2010-01-15
First Post:
2009-07-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Hernia Repair Four Arm Comparative Study
Sponsor:
University of Alexandria
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Four Arm Randomised Trial Comparing Laparoscopic And Open Hernia Repairs
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2010-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study compares the outcome of the four most commonly used operations for the repair of primary groin hernia including the new key hole surgical techniques. It aims at answering the question of whether the new technology really improve the outcome, saves time and reduce patient suffering.
Detailed Description:
The study compares two traditional techniques of inguinal hernia repair; namely Lechtenstien repair and properitoneal repair versus two techniques of laparoscopic hernia repair, namely extraperitoneal and transperitoneal repair. It compares the operative time, complications, postoperative pain and the speed of patient recovery.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: