Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:41 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 11:37 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05283733
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-03-17
First Post:
2022-02-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Open to Laparoscopic Reverse Conversion of Perforated Appendicitis
Sponsor:
Zagazig University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Reverse Conversion (Open to Laparoscopic) in Management of Acute Perforated Appendicitis
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
reverse
Brief Summary:
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Reverse Conversion (Open to Laparoscopic) in management of Acute Perforated Appendicitis
Detailed Description:
Introduction: Acute appendicitis (AA), a frequent intra-abdominal surgical pathology, necessitates a thorough awareness of its symptoms, examination, diagnosis, and total surgical management. The surgical approach to AA is appendectomy; nevertheless, the medical literature continues to argue the merits of open vs laparoscopic surgery. As with other laparoscopic surgical techniques, the literature reports lower discomfort, earlier resumption of oral feeding and shorter hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) as compared to open appendectomy (OA). Additionally, laparoscopy has some drawbacks such as greater cost and lengthier operating durations as compared to open surgery. The goal of this clinical study: was to compare open appendectomy versus laparoscopic conversion from open (reverse conversion) for the treatment of acute perforated appendicitis in our setting. Patients and procedures: 426 patients had perforated appendectomy and divided between two groups: group A (interventional) 213 patients who were subjected to the reverse conversion technique and group B (control)213 patients who were operated by the open technique. The key end goals for comparing both groups were the rates of intraabdominal abscess, rates of wound infection, rates of ileus and rates of reoperation. The hospital length of stay and the operative time were used as secondary end goals for comparison.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: