Viewing Study NCT04209959


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:29 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-28 @ 4:51 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04209959
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2019-12-24
First Post: 2019-12-03
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Nifekalant Instant Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation During Radiofrequency Ablation
Sponsor: Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Nifekalant Instant Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation During Radiofrequency Ablation:a Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2019-01
Last Known Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common tachyarrhythmias with substantial morbidity, disability and mortality. It is estimated that the number of patients with AF is expected to reach 7 million by 2050. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) are the effective treatment for patients with drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF. However, the successful rate of RFCA for persistent AF during the first procedure still relatively low, the investigators also need pharmacological cardioversion or external electrical conversion. Several studies showed intravenous nifekalant injection after RFCA provided relative high rate of sinus conversion during catheter ablation in paroxysmal or persistent AF. Nevertheless, there is still no acceptable universal opinion on which dosage of nifekalant is preferable for converting AF during the operation. In order to address this issue, the investigators initiated the study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous nifekalant injection in the rapid cardioversion of persistent AF during radiofrequency catheter ablation.
Detailed Description: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common tachyarrhythmias with substantial morbidity, disability and mortality. Its prevalence increases with advanced age. About one percent of patients suffering from AF are younger than sixty years, twelve percent are between seventy-five and eighty-five years, and about thirty-three percent are older than eighty years. It is estimated that the number of patients with AF is expected to reach 7 million by 2050. At present, the medical anti-arrhythmic therapy and radiofrequency ablation have been as important treatment for patients with AF. Compared with the treatment of anti-arrhythmia therapy, radiofrequency ablation could significantly improve the rate of long-term AF-free survival. Thus, radiofrequency ablation has become the radical method for patients suffering AF.

However, the successful rate of first radiofrequency ablation for patients with persistent AF was only about 65%. Due to low sinus maintenance rate after catheter ablation, anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) or external electric cardioversion was used to converting atrial fibrillation during the procedure. Compared with traditional AADs for pharmacologic cardioversion, such as quinidine, propafenone and amiodarone, nifekalant is a new class III AADs for rapid cardioversion of persistent AF during radiofrequency ablation, and its prevalence of AF termination during procedure was approximately 64.6%. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous nifekalant injection in the rapid cardioversion of persistent AF during radiofrequency catheter ablation has not been tested in large, randomized, controlled trials, and guidelines provide no clear consensus regarding the best dose recommended.

In order to address this issue, the investigators initiated the study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous nifekalant injection in the rapid cardioversion of persistent AF during radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: