Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:40 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 8:03 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01267734
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2013-12-17
First Post:
2010-12-27
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis - SAfety & EffectiveneSS of Drug-ElUting Stents & Anti-platelet REgimen
Sponsor:
Seoul National University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of New Platform Everolimus-eluting Coronary Stent System (Promus Element) With Zotarolimus-eluting Coronary Stent System (Endeavor Resolute) and Triple Anti-platelet Therapy With Double-dose Clopidogrel Anti-platelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2013-12
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
HOST-ASSURE
Brief Summary:
Objectives
1. To compare the safety and long-term effectiveness of coronary stenting with the new platform Everolimus-Eluting coronary stenting system (EECSS, Promus Element) compared with the Zotarolimus-Eluting coronary stenting system (ZECSS, Endeavor Resolute) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)
2. To determine the short-term efficacy and safety of triple anti-platelet therapy (TAT, Aspirin 100mg qd, Clopidogrel 75mg qd and Cilostazol 100mg bid) compared with double-dose clopidogrel dual anti-platelet therapy (DDAT, Aspirin 100mg qd and Clopidogrel 150mg qd) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES)
Study design Prospective, open-label, 2-by-2 multifactorial, randomized, multicenter trial to test the following in CHD patients
1. Non-inferiority of Promus Element stent compared with Endeavor Resolute stent in reducing target lesion failure (TLF)
2. Non-inferiority of TAT compared with DDAT in reducing net clinical outcome Patients will be randomized in a 2-by-2 factorial manner according to the type of drug eluting stent (EECSS vs. ZECSS) and the type anti-platelet regimen (TAT vs. DDAT). Randomization will also be stratified per presence of DM.
Patient enrollment 3750 patients enrolled at 50 centers in Republic of Korea
Patient follow-up Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 3, 12, 24, 36 months after the procedure. Angiographical follow-up will be recommended to all participants at 13 months after the procedure. Investigator or designee may conduct follow-up as telephone contacts or office visits.
Primary endpoint
1. Target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) up to 12 months for the stent arm
2. Net clinical outcome, defined as a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, CVA and major bleeding by PLATO criteria at 1 month for the anti-platelet arm
1. To compare the safety and long-term effectiveness of coronary stenting with the new platform Everolimus-Eluting coronary stenting system (EECSS, Promus Element) compared with the Zotarolimus-Eluting coronary stenting system (ZECSS, Endeavor Resolute) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)
2. To determine the short-term efficacy and safety of triple anti-platelet therapy (TAT, Aspirin 100mg qd, Clopidogrel 75mg qd and Cilostazol 100mg bid) compared with double-dose clopidogrel dual anti-platelet therapy (DDAT, Aspirin 100mg qd and Clopidogrel 150mg qd) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES)
Study design Prospective, open-label, 2-by-2 multifactorial, randomized, multicenter trial to test the following in CHD patients
1. Non-inferiority of Promus Element stent compared with Endeavor Resolute stent in reducing target lesion failure (TLF)
2. Non-inferiority of TAT compared with DDAT in reducing net clinical outcome Patients will be randomized in a 2-by-2 factorial manner according to the type of drug eluting stent (EECSS vs. ZECSS) and the type anti-platelet regimen (TAT vs. DDAT). Randomization will also be stratified per presence of DM.
Patient enrollment 3750 patients enrolled at 50 centers in Republic of Korea
Patient follow-up Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 3, 12, 24, 36 months after the procedure. Angiographical follow-up will be recommended to all participants at 13 months after the procedure. Investigator or designee may conduct follow-up as telephone contacts or office visits.
Primary endpoint
1. Target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) up to 12 months for the stent arm
2. Net clinical outcome, defined as a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, CVA and major bleeding by PLATO criteria at 1 month for the anti-platelet arm
Detailed Description:
Secondary endpoint
1. Clinical and laboratory endpoint at 1 month All death and cardiac death Myocardial infarction (q wave and non-q wave) Stent thrombosis (definite and possible) CVA (hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic) Bleeding (major and minor) VerifyNow ASA and VerifyNow P2Y12
2. Clinical endpoint at 12 months All death and cardiac death Target vessel-related MI and all MI (q wave and non-q wave) Target vessel/lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven and all) Stent thrombosis (definite/possible/probable) Net clinical outcome including bleeding (major and minor) Acute success of procedure (device, lesion and procedure)
3. Angiographic (including IVUS or OCT) endpoint at 13 months In-stent \& In-segment late loss In-stent \& In-segment % diameter stenosis Angiographic pattern of restenosis Neointimal volume, % neointimal volume and % volume obstruction on IVUS or OCT Degree of stent strut endothelialization on OCT
1. Clinical and laboratory endpoint at 1 month All death and cardiac death Myocardial infarction (q wave and non-q wave) Stent thrombosis (definite and possible) CVA (hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic) Bleeding (major and minor) VerifyNow ASA and VerifyNow P2Y12
2. Clinical endpoint at 12 months All death and cardiac death Target vessel-related MI and all MI (q wave and non-q wave) Target vessel/lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven and all) Stent thrombosis (definite/possible/probable) Net clinical outcome including bleeding (major and minor) Acute success of procedure (device, lesion and procedure)
3. Angiographic (including IVUS or OCT) endpoint at 13 months In-stent \& In-segment late loss In-stent \& In-segment % diameter stenosis Angiographic pattern of restenosis Neointimal volume, % neointimal volume and % volume obstruction on IVUS or OCT Degree of stent strut endothelialization on OCT
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: