Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:39 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 11:44 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06749834
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-02-24
First Post:
2024-12-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Intravenous Thrombolysis and NOAC
Sponsor:
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients on New Oral Anticoagulants
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
New oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban, have become the first-line therapy for preventing ischemic stroke associated with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Despite the effectiveness of NOACs in preventing thromboembolic events, approximately 1% to 2% of patients taking NOACs experience an ischemic stroke annually. Intravenous thrombolysis is an important means of treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, due to concerns about the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or other severe bleeding complications, current guidelines still consider the use of NOACs within 48 hours before symptom onset as a contraindication to intravenous thrombolysis. Epidemiological data suggest that this may result in up to 18% of AF patients being unable to receive intravenous thrombolysis when they have an AIS episode.
Previous animal experiments have shown that NOACs do not increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that 24 to 48 hours after taking NOACs, the anti-Xa level in patients is relatively low (\<0.5 U/mL). In recent years, multiple retrospective studies and meta-analyses have shown that prior use of NOACs does not increase the risk of sICH in AIS patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis, and there are no significant differences in functional outcomes at 3 months. With solid pharmacokinetic and retrospective clinical evidence to support, it is hypothesized that IVT are safe in IS-NOAC patient. The investigators hereby propose a prospective multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of IVT in acute IS-NOAC.
Previous animal experiments have shown that NOACs do not increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that 24 to 48 hours after taking NOACs, the anti-Xa level in patients is relatively low (\<0.5 U/mL). In recent years, multiple retrospective studies and meta-analyses have shown that prior use of NOACs does not increase the risk of sICH in AIS patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis, and there are no significant differences in functional outcomes at 3 months. With solid pharmacokinetic and retrospective clinical evidence to support, it is hypothesized that IVT are safe in IS-NOAC patient. The investigators hereby propose a prospective multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of IVT in acute IS-NOAC.
Detailed Description:
In this prospective cohort study, the investigators aim to recruit consecutive IS-NOAC patients who met the inclusion criteria. The investigators sought to determine the safety and efficacy of IVT in acute ischemic stroke patients on NOACs. It is hypothesized that for IS-DOAC patients with the last intake of NOAC within 48 hours, IVT improved neurological outcomes with acceptable safety compared to a cohort of acute IS-NOAC patients excluded from IVT.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: