Viewing Study NCT04092634


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 2:38 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-03 @ 3:03 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04092634
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-06-26
First Post: 2019-09-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Dual Mobility in "High Risk" Patients
Sponsor: Rush University Medical Center
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Dual-mobility vs. Single-bearing Components in THA at "High Risk" for Prosthetic Dislocation
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients considered to be high risk for prosthetic dislocation undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a dual mobility bearing versus a conventional, single bearing design.
Detailed Description: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients considered to be at high risk for prosthetic dislocation undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a dual mobility bearing versus a conventional, single-bearing design.

We hypothesize that in primary THA patients considered to be at high risk for prosthetic dislocation, the use of dual-mobility components will be associated with a lower dislocation rate in the first year following the index procedure. We do not anticipate a difference. In other clinical outcome measures or functional outcome scores between the two cohorts.

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial with two groups: THA with dual mobility.

44 components vs THA with single-bearing designs

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: