Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:34 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 1:11 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05651334
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-08
First Post:
2022-11-28
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Smokers: an Examination of Mediating Neural Pathways.
Sponsor:
Kent State University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Smokers: an Examination of Mediating Neural Pathways.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The primary objective of this study is to examine the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on a regulation of craving task (ROC task) and evaluate the feasibility of targeting rTMS via fMRI based neuronavigation. Specifically, we will examine BOLD activation within the DLPFC when control over craving is exerted in order to identify if 1) the task produces reliable activations in an area capable of being targeted by a standard figure-8 coil and 2) examine if the coordinates of the area are distinct from the area targeted via anatomical neuronavigation alone. Last, we will examine if rTMS, compared to sham, is capable of improving cognitive control over craving measured at outcome. The current pilot study will examine these aims in a sample of tobacco dependent adults (N=16) (with final sample size dependent on availability of funds).
Detailed Description:
The study will include functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline as well as demographic, psychological, and tobacco use assessments. Following initial assessment, participants will undergo one active rTMS session (20 Hz rTMS, 900 pulses per session, applied to left DLPFC). The outcome session will include assessments repeated from baseline.
The current proposal will examine the following aims. Aim 1: To test the potential for active rTMS to improve cognitive control of craving. Hypothesis: Active rTMS (compared to sham rTMS) will result in significant improvement in control over craving assessed by self-reported craving during the ROC task as well as in terms of activity in prefrontal regions associated with cognitive control during the ROC task.
Aim 2 (feasibility): To examine the feasibility of using fMRI BOLD activation in the DLPFC during the ROC task to target rTMS. BOLD activations during successful control over craving trials will be examined in terms of their reliability within participant and their feasibility as a target for rTMS delivered via standard figure 8 coil (capable of inducing synaptic firing 1.5-3.0 cm beneath the scalp). Additionally, the coordinates for the target identified via BOLD activation during the ROC task will be compared to the coordinates for the target identified by using standard neuronavigation to the DLPFC via anatomical fMRI, in order to determine if these areas are distinct in terms of the direct effect of the stimulation field (approximately 5 cm2).
The current proposal will examine the following aims. Aim 1: To test the potential for active rTMS to improve cognitive control of craving. Hypothesis: Active rTMS (compared to sham rTMS) will result in significant improvement in control over craving assessed by self-reported craving during the ROC task as well as in terms of activity in prefrontal regions associated with cognitive control during the ROC task.
Aim 2 (feasibility): To examine the feasibility of using fMRI BOLD activation in the DLPFC during the ROC task to target rTMS. BOLD activations during successful control over craving trials will be examined in terms of their reliability within participant and their feasibility as a target for rTMS delivered via standard figure 8 coil (capable of inducing synaptic firing 1.5-3.0 cm beneath the scalp). Additionally, the coordinates for the target identified via BOLD activation during the ROC task will be compared to the coordinates for the target identified by using standard neuronavigation to the DLPFC via anatomical fMRI, in order to determine if these areas are distinct in terms of the direct effect of the stimulation field (approximately 5 cm2).
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: