Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:31 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 1:07 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06120634
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-11-07
First Post:
2023-09-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Outcomes of Circumcision Via Open and Plastibell Methods
Sponsor:
Tehsil Headquarter Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Quasi-experimental Study Comparing Outcomes and Parent's Responses in 600+ Circumcised Boys in a Lower-Middle Income Country
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Circumcision is considered one of the most common elective surgical procedures, particularly among Muslim and Jewish males. Of all the available techniques, Plastibell is gaining traction amongst surgeons due to its safety in the form of a lower complication rate. The current quasi-experimental study aimed to compare the Open and Plastibell methods of circumcision in a study population which comprised of boys up to 5 years of age who were grouped into the Open method and Plastibell based on parental preference. Follow-up occurred on the 5th, 10th, and, 30th post-procedural day. Basic demographic data, procedural duration, and outcomes were documented.
Detailed Description:
This study was conducted to compare the Open and Plastibell method of circumcision in boys up to 5-years of age, in terms of procedural time, outcomes and parental satisfaction.
This was a quasi-experimental study of boys up to 5-years of age. Boys meeting the inclusion criteria were categorized into two groups based on parental preference - Open method and Plastibell. Patients were followed-up on the 5th, 10th and 30th post-procedural day. Basic demographic data, procedural duration, and outcomes were documented.
Of 646 boys brought to the hospital for circumcision, 608 met the inclusion criteria with equal participants in both groups. The median age in Open and Plastibell groups was three and five months respectively. The median operating time was significantly shorter in the Plastibell group (4.2 min) compared to the Open method (13 min). Of the complications recorded in 91 children, more were observed in Plastibell group. Post-procedure bleeding occurred in 1.2% children (n=7). Open method resulted in infection, excessive skin removal (n=8 each) and urinary retention (n=7) whereas Plastibell impaction (n=21) and inadequate skin removal (n=19) were the commonest complications in the Plastibell group which were significantly associated with age of the boys. There were no serious adverse events. Open method was preferred by parents for cosmesis and Plastibell for ease of care.
It is concluded that Plastibell, compared to open method, is a quicker method of circumcision and is safe for boys up to 5-years of age, however, earlier circumcisions are associated with lesser complications. The follow-up ensures patient safety.
This was a quasi-experimental study of boys up to 5-years of age. Boys meeting the inclusion criteria were categorized into two groups based on parental preference - Open method and Plastibell. Patients were followed-up on the 5th, 10th and 30th post-procedural day. Basic demographic data, procedural duration, and outcomes were documented.
Of 646 boys brought to the hospital for circumcision, 608 met the inclusion criteria with equal participants in both groups. The median age in Open and Plastibell groups was three and five months respectively. The median operating time was significantly shorter in the Plastibell group (4.2 min) compared to the Open method (13 min). Of the complications recorded in 91 children, more were observed in Plastibell group. Post-procedure bleeding occurred in 1.2% children (n=7). Open method resulted in infection, excessive skin removal (n=8 each) and urinary retention (n=7) whereas Plastibell impaction (n=21) and inadequate skin removal (n=19) were the commonest complications in the Plastibell group which were significantly associated with age of the boys. There were no serious adverse events. Open method was preferred by parents for cosmesis and Plastibell for ease of care.
It is concluded that Plastibell, compared to open method, is a quicker method of circumcision and is safe for boys up to 5-years of age, however, earlier circumcisions are associated with lesser complications. The follow-up ensures patient safety.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: