Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:24 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 1:02 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00365534
Status:
WITHDRAWN
Last Update Posted:
2010-03-26
First Post:
2006-08-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Use of Magnetic Imaging to Asses the Efficacy of Cap Assisted Colonoscopy in Reducing Looping and Improving Patient Acceptance for the Colonoscopy Procedure
Sponsor:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Double-Blinded Randomized Study Comparison the Mechanism of Looping Formation and Subject's Acceptance During CAC and Regular Colonoscopy by MEI (MIC Study)
Status:
WITHDRAWN
Status Verified Date:
2010-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
The study was incorporated in another study.
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to compare the mechanism of loop formation and acceptance of CAC and regular colonoscopy by MEI.
Detailed Description:
Colonoscopy is widely used for the investigation of lower gastrointestinal tract disease.However,colonoscopy remains a technically difficult procedure. As the colon is a mobile organ, looping may occur when the colonoscope passes through.Hence,reducing looping during procedure is very improtant to achieve succes as well as patient acceptance.Recently,some studies shown that cap-assisted colonoscopy(CAC)allow better visualisation of the colonic folds, thus increase success rate.However, previous studies shown that magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI)is useful as an adjunct to assist endoscopist in performing the procedure and as a modality to look for the mechanism of looping. Because of such concern,our study is to compare the mechanism of looping formation and acceptance of CAC and regular colonoscopy by MEI.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: