Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:51 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 10:41 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01438203
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2012-09-05
First Post:
2011-09-19
Brief Title:
Thrust Manipulation Versus Non-Thrust Manipulation
Sponsor:
Walsh University
Organization:
Walsh University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Early Use of Thrust Manipulation Versus Non-Thrust Manipulation A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2012-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The objective of this study is to investigate the comparative benefit of thrust and non-thrust manipulation on a population of patients with low back pain The investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference in 4 week outcomes or greater between the two groups
Detailed Description:
Thrust manipulation is considered traditional spinal manipulation Nonthrust manipulation is considered mobilization The mobilization will be used in a similar manner as in clinical practice and this differs from past studies
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None