Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:18 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 12:15 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07004634
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-06-10
First Post:
2025-05-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Drainage Methods in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (DEMUREļ¼
Sponsor:
Ruijin Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of the Application Effects of Different Drainage Modes in the Perioperative Period of Minimally Invasive Three-Field Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This RCT compares three drainage approaches after minimally invasive esophagectomy (chest tube + thoracic mediastinal drainage tube, thoracic, and abdominal mediastinal drainage tube) to evaluate perioperative outcomes, addressing current evidence gaps in pain and complication profiles.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: