Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:15 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:45 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05877560
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-12-02
First Post:
2023-05-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Symptomatic Convergence Insufficiency
Sponsor:
Midwestern University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Study Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation to Facilitate the Effectiveness of Vergence/Accommodative Therapy in Symptomatic Convergence Insufficiency
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
NIBSCI
Brief Summary:
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to test the effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation in treating adults with symptomatic convergence insufficiency compared to vergence/accommodative therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Can non-invasive brain stimulation shorten the treatment time of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy for convergence insufficiency?
2. Is non-invasive brain stimulation alone just as effective as office-based vergence/accommodative therapy in treating convergence insufficiency?
The investigators hypothesize that non-invasive brain stimulation will shorten the treatment time from 12 weeks to 8 weeks of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy and that non-invasive brain stimulation alone would be equally effective as office-based vergence/accommodative therapy in improving symptomatic convergence insufficiency.
Participants will be randomized into one of three treatment groups:
1. Non-invasive brain stimulation with office-based vergence/accommodative therapy.
2. Sham stimulation with office-based vergence/accommodative therapy.
3. Non-invasive brain stimulation only.
Researchers will compare baseline measurements of near point of convergence (NPC) and positive fusional vergence (PFV) to post-treatment measurements for each group.
1. Can non-invasive brain stimulation shorten the treatment time of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy for convergence insufficiency?
2. Is non-invasive brain stimulation alone just as effective as office-based vergence/accommodative therapy in treating convergence insufficiency?
The investigators hypothesize that non-invasive brain stimulation will shorten the treatment time from 12 weeks to 8 weeks of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy and that non-invasive brain stimulation alone would be equally effective as office-based vergence/accommodative therapy in improving symptomatic convergence insufficiency.
Participants will be randomized into one of three treatment groups:
1. Non-invasive brain stimulation with office-based vergence/accommodative therapy.
2. Sham stimulation with office-based vergence/accommodative therapy.
3. Non-invasive brain stimulation only.
Researchers will compare baseline measurements of near point of convergence (NPC) and positive fusional vergence (PFV) to post-treatment measurements for each group.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: