Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:15 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:44 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00797160
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2008-11-25
First Post:
2008-11-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Propofol Versus Midazolam as Premedication for Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)
Sponsor:
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Propofol and Remifentanil Versus Midazolam and Remifentanil as Premedication Allowing Very Early Extubation After Surfactant Treatment in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2008-08
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of the study is to compare the intubation conditions among propofol and remifentanil versus midazolam and remifentanil in premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. At the same time, to show the group of drugs that could let the neonates with no residual sedation after the use of surfactant (the possibility of the premature neonates to be readily extubated after the use of surfactant).
Detailed Description:
It has been demonstrated that remifentanil, due to it its very short context-sensitive, has an interesting potential for use in premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Indeed, remifentanil allowed an adequate level of sedation and analgesia as well as rapid recovery after discontinuation. The aim of the present study was to compares the intubation conditions among propofol and remifentanil versus midazolam and remifentanil in premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: