Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:15 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:44 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06751160
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-12-27
First Post:
2024-12-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparative Effects of Dry Needling Versus Soft Tissue Mobilization on Hamstring Tightness
Sponsor:
Riphah International University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Effects of Dry Needling Versus Soft Tissue Mobilization on Hamstring Tightness in Chronic Low Back Pain
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The hamstring tightness is considered as the inability to achieve knee extension greater than 160 degrees while hip is flexed at 90 degrees. When low back pain (LBP) persists for 12 weeks or longer, it is termed as chronic low back pain. The objective of study is to see the effect of dry needling versus soft tissue mobilization on hamstring muscle on pain, range of motion and functionality in patients with chronic low back pain.
Detailed Description:
A randomized clinical trial will be conducted at Hameed Latif Medical Centre through non probability convenient sampling technique on 30 subjects which will be divided into two groups' 15 subjects in group A and 15 subjects in group B through computer generated software for Randomization. Both groups will be conventional therapy and spinal mobilization (posterior anterior glide) of grade 1 and 2 (3 sets of 6 repetitions) as baseline treatment. Group A was will be dry needling and Group B will be Soft Tissue Mobilization.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: