Viewing Study NCT05428995


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:21 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-01 @ 7:38 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT05428995
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-01-23
First Post: 2022-06-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison of Two Videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC vs Airtraq) for Awake Intubation
Sponsor: Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Randomized Comparison Between the C-MAC and Airtraq Videolaryngoscopes for First-attempt Intubation Success in Awake Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airway.
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2023-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: AWAKECMACTRA
Brief Summary: Patients with anticipated difficult airway are recommended to be managed with an awake tracheal intubation. Initially fibreoptic bronchoscopy was considered the gold standard, but in the last decade videolaryngoscopes have been demonstrated to be an efficacy alternative technique. Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis was published investigating the efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy compared with fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation. Eight prospective, randomized studies were included, with different videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC, GlideScope, Pentax AWS, McGraft, and Bullard). However, a direct comparison of two different videolaryngoscopes for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway has not been performed.
Detailed Description: This is a clinical prospective randomized-controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare two different devices (C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Airtraq videolaryngoscope) for awake tracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways scheduled for surgery. The primary endpoint will be to compare first-attempt intubation success rate between the two videolaryngoscopes. Secondary outcomes will be to compare: difference in the overall success rate, number of intubation attempts, Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view, incidence of complications related to intubation, difficulty experienced by the operator, patient's tolerability of the procedure.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: