Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:20 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 9:02 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05374395
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-01-08
First Post:
2022-05-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Enhancing Substance Use Treatment Services to Decrease Dropout and Improve Outpatient Treatment Utilization in Emerging Adults
Sponsor:
UConn Health
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Enhancing Substance Use Treatment Services to Decrease Dropout and Improve Outpatient Treatment Utilization in Emerging Adults
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
P2P
Brief Summary:
Emerging adults (ages 18-25) are at higher risk for substance use disorders, including opiate addiction, than any other age group but are also more likely to drop out early from substance use treatment services. This project will evaluate an enhancement to usual services, delivered by peer recovery supports, specifically aimed at improving treatment adherence and reducing dropout in this age group. The study will also answer key questions about risk factors for dropout among emerging adults and the financial sustainability of enhancing services to reduce dropout.
Detailed Description:
Emerging adults (EAs; ages 18-25) have higher rates of substance use disorders than any other age group and have been hit particularly hard by the opioid crisis. EAs also demonstrate poor adherence to healthcare regimens associated with substance use services, with higher dropout rates and lower service utilization than any other age group. This poor adherence leads to devastating outcomes, including continued substance use, incarceration, and overdose. In addition, high dropout rates contribute to skyrocketing costs to treatment systems as a result of more acute service needs, expensive service utilization, and long waitlists. Cost-effective strategies that are aimed at improving treatment adherence to substance use services and tailored to meet the unique developmental needs of EAs are an imminent need. Further, little is known about risk factors for dropout specific to this age group, hindering effective system responses to this significant problem.
At the same time, substance use service systems are increasingly using peer recovery supports (PRS; i.e., paraprofessionals who have "lived experience" with substance use problems) to bolster treatment outcomes without incurring considerable additional costs. However, services delivered by PRS have not been tailored specifically to reduce EA dropout, and few have been rigorously tested at all. The current study will evaluate an innovative EA-specific dropout prevention enhancement to usual treatment services, delivered by PRS in community-based substance use treatment clinics (Aim 1). The investigators will employ a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design, resulting in each clinic having a longitudinal usual services phase and a longitudinal dropout prevention phase. The two phases will be compared on rates of EA dropout and service utilization using objective data from clinical charts.
At the same time, substance use service systems are increasingly using peer recovery supports (PRS; i.e., paraprofessionals who have "lived experience" with substance use problems) to bolster treatment outcomes without incurring considerable additional costs. However, services delivered by PRS have not been tailored specifically to reduce EA dropout, and few have been rigorously tested at all. The current study will evaluate an innovative EA-specific dropout prevention enhancement to usual treatment services, delivered by PRS in community-based substance use treatment clinics (Aim 1). The investigators will employ a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design, resulting in each clinic having a longitudinal usual services phase and a longitudinal dropout prevention phase. The two phases will be compared on rates of EA dropout and service utilization using objective data from clinical charts.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: