Viewing Study NCT05910060


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 2:11 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-27 @ 11:16 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT05910060
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2023-06-18
First Post: 2023-06-09
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Ankle Trauma in Children, Application of Ottawa Ankle Rules From 5 Years Old, What is the Impact
Sponsor: Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Ankle Trauma in Children, Application of Ottawa Ankle Rules From 5 Years Old, What is the Impact
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2023-06
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: OTTAWAKIDS
Brief Summary: Ankle sprain in children is a very common pathology. Currently in France, a standard X-ray is done in almost all cases. However, the literature has for several years validated the consideration of the Ottawa ankle rules in children to avoid the realization of these X-rays.

Our study is an evaluation of clinical practice. The aim is to assess the impact of the implementation of a new protocol using the Ottawa ankle rules from the age of 5. In particular, radiographic sparing and absence of diagnostic error.
Detailed Description: Main objective: To compare the rate of X-rays performed before and after implementation of the protocol in pediatric emergencies.

Secondary objectives (if applicable):

* Compare the time spent in the emergency room of patients before and after implementation of the protocol
* Evaluate the gain in terms of cost for the healthcare system
* Evaluate the adherence of caregivers to compliance with the protocol
* Evaluate the decrease in the rate of X-rays performed in different age groups.
* Evaluation of the consultation rate in the month for the same reason

Primary endpoint = X-ray rate as a % of X-rays performed on the number of children presenting to pediatric emergencies over the period studied (before implementation of the protocol in a similar period = May to October 2022 / after implementation of the protocol = May to October 2023) Secondary endpoints =

* Time spent in the emergency room in min
* Estimation of the cost for the healthcare system by taking the cost of an x-ray and evaluating the gain on the reduction in the rate of x-rays performed (number of x-rays - cost of an x-ray)
* Evaluation of caregiver compliance by measuring the number of X-rays performed outside the protocol (X-ray performed despite the absence of Ottawa criteria)
* X-ray rate by age group
* Spontaneous reconsultation rate within 1 month

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: