Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:10 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-08 @ 6:16 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03285360
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-01-31
First Post:
2017-09-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effectiveness of Bioactiveglass Air Abrasion Versus Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effectiveness of Sylc Air Abrasion Bioactive Glass Technology Versus Fluoride Varnish Application in Management of Hypersensitivity of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Will the use of Bioactive glass with air abrasion technology (Sylc) compared to Fluoride Varnish (Biflourid 10) affects the degree of pain in patients complaining from hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions?
Detailed Description:
* Population: Patients complaining from Dentin Hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions.
* Intervention: Sylc, Air Abrasion Bioactive glass (Denfotex Research Ltd.)
* Comparison: BiFlourid 10, Fluoride Varnish (VOCO, Germany)
* Outcome measures: Dentin Hypersensitivity
Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Dentin Hypersensitivity
* Thermal
* Tactile
* Evaporative
* Intervention: Sylc, Air Abrasion Bioactive glass (Denfotex Research Ltd.)
* Comparison: BiFlourid 10, Fluoride Varnish (VOCO, Germany)
* Outcome measures: Dentin Hypersensitivity
Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Dentin Hypersensitivity
* Thermal
* Tactile
* Evaporative
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: