Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 3:34 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04664595
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-08-23
First Post:
2014-09-02
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Requirements of Propofol With Target Controlled Infusions for Supraglottic Airway Devices
Sponsor:
Prince of Songkla University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Requirements of Propofol With Target Controlled Infusions for Supraglottic Airway Devices
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
to evaluate and compare the effect-site concentration of propofol with the TCI system for second-generation SGA device insertion between the I-gel™, Supreme™, ProSeal™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction II™.
to determine the hemodynamic changes during insertion of supraglottic devices in patients undergoing elective surgery and any complications after device insertion.
to determine the hemodynamic changes during insertion of supraglottic devices in patients undergoing elective surgery and any complications after device insertion.
Detailed Description:
The investigators enrolled ASA physical status I-III patients who were 18-70 years old and scheduled for general anesthesia for elective non-cardiac surgery with SGA devices.Adults with a potentially difficult airway (cervical spine disease, Mallampati classification IV, or a mouth opening less than 2.5 cm.), reactive airway disease, signs of respiratory infection or a plan to remain intubated were excluded from the study. The investigators also excluded patients who had a risk of gastric aspiration or morbid obesity (body mass index \> 35 kg/m2).
Patients were randomized into 4 groups (I-gel™, Supreme™, ProSeal™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction II™ SGAs) according to a computer generated randomization list and patients were allocated consecutively. The sample size of each group required 10 patients.
All patients were pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen. After the administration of 2 µg/ml intravenous fentanyl for 5 minutes, anesthesia was induced with the Schnider pharmacokinetic TCI system. After equilibration of the plasma-site and effect-site concentrations in propofol TCI, 1 of the 4 types of SGA was randomly inserted by two anesthesiologists (resident trainee and staff doctor) who were unaware of the actual plasma concentration of propofol without the use of a muscle relaxant.
The response of each patient determined the effect-site concentration of propofol of the next patient. "No Response" was defined as Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Score = 0 and "Response" was defined as Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Score ≥ 1. If the insertion of the supraglottic airway device was successful ("No Response"), then the target effect-site concentration was decreased by a step of 0.4 µg/ml. If the insertion failed ("Response"), the target effect-site concentration was increased by the same dose. The patients' responses to LMA insertion was classified by blinded investigators.
Patients were randomized into 4 groups (I-gel™, Supreme™, ProSeal™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction II™ SGAs) according to a computer generated randomization list and patients were allocated consecutively. The sample size of each group required 10 patients.
All patients were pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen. After the administration of 2 µg/ml intravenous fentanyl for 5 minutes, anesthesia was induced with the Schnider pharmacokinetic TCI system. After equilibration of the plasma-site and effect-site concentrations in propofol TCI, 1 of the 4 types of SGA was randomly inserted by two anesthesiologists (resident trainee and staff doctor) who were unaware of the actual plasma concentration of propofol without the use of a muscle relaxant.
The response of each patient determined the effect-site concentration of propofol of the next patient. "No Response" was defined as Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Score = 0 and "Response" was defined as Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Score ≥ 1. If the insertion of the supraglottic airway device was successful ("No Response"), then the target effect-site concentration was decreased by a step of 0.4 µg/ml. If the insertion failed ("Response"), the target effect-site concentration was increased by the same dose. The patients' responses to LMA insertion was classified by blinded investigators.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: