Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:07 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:12 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07081360
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-08-29
First Post:
2025-07-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Neoadjuvant vs Upfront Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer and Periampullary Cancer
Sponsor:
Minia University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Upfront Surgery for Clearly Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer and Periampullary Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery significantly improved the survival of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients, but there is a problem that only about 50% of patients start adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreatectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy might control potential metastatic lesions which are not being detected in early disease status and improve the R0 resection rate. In addition, it prevents futile surgery by selecting patients with rapid progression of disease. Furthermore, compared to chemotherapy administered after surgery, more patients can complete the planned chemotherapy schedule in neoadjuvant setting.
There are still few studies worldwide that prospectively explored the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable PC and periampullary cancer and the administration of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable PC depends on individual clinical judgment. Therefore, systematic and prospective clinical trials are essential to standardize treatment protocol in resectable PC and periampullary Cancer.
This randomized controlled trial compares neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery for patients with clearly resectable pancreatic head cancer and periampullary cancer. The study aims to determine if neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival compared to immediate surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.
There are still few studies worldwide that prospectively explored the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable PC and periampullary cancer and the administration of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable PC depends on individual clinical judgment. Therefore, systematic and prospective clinical trials are essential to standardize treatment protocol in resectable PC and periampullary Cancer.
This randomized controlled trial compares neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery for patients with clearly resectable pancreatic head cancer and periampullary cancer. The study aims to determine if neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival compared to immediate surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.
Detailed Description:
Pancreatic cancer is the seventh highest cause of death from cancer worldwide, with only 20% of patients presenting with resectable disease. Despite potentially curative resections, 5-year survival remains at 20%. This study evaluates whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve outcomes by eliminating occult metastatic disease and improving resection margins.
Patients with clearly resectable pancreatic head cancer or periampullary cancer will be randomized 1:1 to either neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by open or laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (Arm A) or upfront laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint is overall survival, with secondary endpoints including R0 resection rate , disease-free survival and perioperative outcomes.
Patients with clearly resectable pancreatic head cancer or periampullary cancer will be randomized 1:1 to either neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by open or laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (Arm A) or upfront laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint is overall survival, with secondary endpoints including R0 resection rate , disease-free survival and perioperative outcomes.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: