Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:05 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 1:33 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03260660
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-01-29
First Post:
2017-08-14
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of MR Elastography Methods Without and With Compressed Sensing
Sponsor:
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of MR Elastography Methods Without and With Compressed Sensing
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
In this research study, the investigators will compare the liver stiffness results obtained from the current Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) method to liver stiffness results obtained from a method that uses faster imaging techniques.
Detailed Description:
MR elastography is increasingly used to assess liver stiffness in pediatric and adult patients with chronic liver diseases. While numerous tissue abnormalities can affect liver stiffness, liver stiffness measured by MR elastography is most often used to predict and quantify liver fibrosis. Conventional MR elastography techniques require multiple breath-holds that are 12-20 seconds in length. In the pediatric population, reliable breath-holding \>10 seconds can be challenging. Recently, compressed sensing has become available as a method for accelerating image data acquisition, and thus shortening breath-holds.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: