Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:04 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 4:03 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06119360
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-11-07
First Post:
2023-10-30
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Two Different Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Cervical Immobilized Patients
Sponsor:
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of the Intubation Success Rate Between Two Techniques Using Lightwand in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Conventional vs. Face-to-face Technique
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study compares two different approaches of lightwand intubation techniques in cervical immobilized patients.
Detailed Description:
This study compares two approaches in lightwand intubation techniques in cervical immobilized patients. One is a conventional approach that involves scooping movement with mandible protraction. The other is a face-to-face approach that inserts lightwand with a front-facing position. This study is conducted as a randomized, prospective, single-blinded design.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: