Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:02 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:26 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07207460
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-10-06
First Post:
2025-09-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Hydrodissection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Sponsor:
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Hydrodissection Techniques Using 5% Dextrose for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
KTS
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of perineural hydrodissection methods performed with 5 mL D5W solution and three different injection techniques \[ultrasound-guided in-plane, ultrasound-guided out-of-plane, and blind technique\] in cases diagnosed with mild to moderate CTS by EMG.
Detailed Description:
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a highly prevalent condition in the general population, markedly impairing daily activities and sleep quality. Depending on disease severity and symptom burden, treatment approaches are broadly categorized as conservative or surgical. Beyond lifestyle modifications, numerous conservative interventions-including splinting, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, phonophoresis, hydrodissection, kinesiotaping, corticosteroid (CS) injections, low-level laser therapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, manual therapy, and acupuncture-have demonstrated clinical efficacy. More recently, 5% dextrose injections have emerged as a safe alternative to CS with minimal adverse effects. Injection therapies vary in both content and technique; however, no consensus exists regarding the optimal approach. Given the importance of minimizing side effects and ensuring long-term effectiveness, the refinement of injection agents and techniques remains a priority. Although ultrasound-guided injections improve safety and accuracy, they require expertise and incur additional costs, whereas blind techniques have long been applied reliably in clinical practice. Nevertheless, comparative studies evaluating these techniques remain limited. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare three different injection techniques for the management of CTS.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: