Viewing Study NCT05045794


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 1:47 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 1:12 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT05045794
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-06-12
First Post: 2021-08-31
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Bridge to HOPE: Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion Versus Cold Storage Prior to Liver Transplantation
Sponsor: Bridge to Life Ltd.
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Multicenter, Prospective, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of the VitaSmart Liver Machine Perfusion System With Static Cold Storage for Organ Preservation Prior to Liver Transplantation
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This is a prospective, multi-center, controlled, randomized, pivotal study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the VitaSmart Liver Machine Perfusion System by comparing clinical outcomes in patients undergoing liver transplantation with ex-vivo liver preservation using static cold storage (SCS) followed by hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) versus SCS only.
Detailed Description: Patients on the UNOS waiting list for liver transplantation who have been consented, meet study eligibility criteria and are matched to a liver allograft from donation after brain death (DBD) or donation after circulatory death (DCD) that meet the extended risk eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to SCS followed by HOPE (HOPE arm) or to SCS only (SCS arm). The objective of the study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the VitaSmart Liver Machine by comparing endpoints between the HOPE and SCS arms.

Following transplantation, patients will be monitored daily (labs, adverse events, medications/procedures) while inpatient, and then additionally on Days 14 and 30 and Months 3, 6 and 12. The primary efficacy endpoint of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) rate will be assessed between HOPE and control using a non-inferiority design. An interim analysis is planned after approximately 70% of patients have been completed primary endpoint data collection to assess for early study completion based on non-inferiority or superiority.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: True
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: