Viewing Study NCT01345747



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 11:31 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 10:34 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT01345747
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2011-05-02
First Post: 2011-04-25

Brief Title: The Laryngeal Tube Suction Versus Endotracheal Tube for Ventilation in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
Sponsor: Prince of Songkla University
Organization: Prince of Songkla University

Study Overview

Official Title: The Laryngeal Tube Suction vs Endotracheal Tube for Ventilation in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2011-04
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study the investigators compare peak airway pressure PAP expire tidal volume TV end tidal CO2 ETCO2 SpO2 mean arterial pressure MAP and heart rate HR after the insertion of laryngeal tube suction or endotracheal tube in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery
Detailed Description: Background

For standard procedure the endotracheal tube is used to ventilate the anesthetized patients who undergo gynecological laparoscopic surgery that increase intrabdominal pressure Now there is a new supraglottic airway device laryngeal tube suction LTs can be use instead of ETT

Objective This study the investigators compare peak airway pressure PAP expire tidal volume TV end tidal CO2 ETCO2 SpO2 mean arterial pressure MAP and heart rate HR after the insertion of laryngeal tube suction or endotracheal tube in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery

Material and methods Prospective single blinded randomized control trial the patients were divided into two groups LTs group and ETT group n 60 for each group All patients were induced anesthesia with fentanyl 1-2 mcgkg propofol 2 mgkg vecuronium 01 mgkg then maintained anesthesia with air oxygen 30 Respirator setting are tidal volume 10 mlkg IE 12 adjust RR base on ETCO2 keep ETCO2 35-40 mmHg

Results No statistical difference in demographic data between groups PAP and ETCO2 in the LTs group were significant higher than ETT group in the first 5 and 10 minutes but no statistically significant after 10 minutes until the end of operation No statistically significant in TV and SpO2 between groups In ETT group MAP and HR after insertion are significant higher than LTs group no statistically significant about postoperative complication such as sorethroat hoarseness and nausea vomiting

Conclusion LTs can be used in gynecological laparoscopic surgery like ETT

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None