Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:46 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-02 @ 6:08 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01958294
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-01-18
First Post:
2013-10-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
The MICHI NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM: Evaluation of Performance in Carotid Artery Stent Procedures (The LOTUS Study)
Sponsor:
Silk Road Medical
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The MICHI NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM: Evaluation of Performance in Carotid Artery Stent Procedures (The LOTUS Study)
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
LOTUS
Brief Summary:
The LOTUS Study is intended to demonstrate the usability of the MICHI Neuroprotection System (MICHI NPS) or MICHI Neuroprotection System with filter (MICHI NPS+f) for use in subjects who are candidates for Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS). It is a prospective, single arm study in which a maximum of 30 study subjects, and a run-in enrollment of up to 10 subjects will be followed immediately post-op and at 30 days.
Detailed Description:
Cerebral embolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS) can often precipitate severe adverse neurological effects. Most major clinical studies of CAS have used distal filters for cerebral protection and have compared the neurologic complication rates with those of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Many currently available embolic protection devices, however, have limited efficacy in capturing microembolic debris liberated during stenting, pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. Furthermore, distal protection systems are limited by the need to cross the lesion prior to deployment. Some studies have shown a relatively high incidence of cerebral infarction even when distal protection devices are employed.
Cerebral protection with carotid flow reversal is a method that was developed by Parodi, et al. (2005), as an alternative to the use of distal protection devices. While novel in its approach, this method too has its limitations. Criado, et al. (2004), developed a derivative technique that employs carotid flow reversal prior to traversing the stenosis that can be accomplished by directly accessing carotid anatomy without the use of the transfemoral approach. Major benefits to this method include the ability to perform the procedure on patients with severe carotid tortuosity and difficult aortic arch anatomy.
Cerebral protection with carotid flow reversal is a method that was developed by Parodi, et al. (2005), as an alternative to the use of distal protection devices. While novel in its approach, this method too has its limitations. Criado, et al. (2004), developed a derivative technique that employs carotid flow reversal prior to traversing the stenosis that can be accomplished by directly accessing carotid anatomy without the use of the transfemoral approach. Major benefits to this method include the ability to perform the procedure on patients with severe carotid tortuosity and difficult aortic arch anatomy.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: