Viewing Study NCT03519594


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 1:46 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 5:18 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03519594
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2018-05-09
First Post: 2018-04-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: The Size of Pelvic Hematoma Can be a Predictive Factor for Angioembolization
Sponsor: Asan Medical Center
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: The Size of Pelvic Hematoma Can be a Predictive Factor for Angioembolization in Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Trauma
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2018-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Unstable pelvic fracture with bleeding can be fatal, with a mortality rate of up to 40%. Therefore, early detection and treatment are important in unstable pelvic trauma. We investigated the early predictive factors for possible embolization in patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma. The purpose of this study was to predict the necessity of embolization and the timing of angiography using CT scans.
Detailed Description: Background: Unstable pelvic fracture with bleeding can be fatal, with a mortality rate of up to 40%. Therefore, early detection and treatment are important in unstable pelvic trauma. We investigated the early predictive factors for possible embolization in patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma.

Methods: From January 2011 to December 2013, 46 patients with shock arrived at a single hospital within 24 h after injury. Of them, 44 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) after initial resuscitation, except for 2 who were dead on arrival. Nine patients with other organ injuries were excluded. Seventeen patients underwent embolization. A single radiologist measured the width (longest length in axial view) and length (longest length in coronal view) of pelvic hematoma on CT scans. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were reviewed retrospectively.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: