Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:46 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 11:36 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04948294
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-10-27
First Post:
2021-06-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
Sponsor:
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Using Two Types of Blade in Patients Receiving Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope: Channeled Blade vs. Non-channeled Blade
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The present study compares two different types of videolaryngoscope blade, which is a channeled and non-channeled blade. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of the type of videolaryngoscope blade on the intubation condition.
Detailed Description:
In tracheal intubation for general anesthesia, one of the two types of the blade during a video laryngoscopy can be used, one is a channeled blade that has a channel for tracheal tube launching, the other is a non-channeled blade. In the present study, the outcomes by using two types of the videolaryngoscope blade such as the intubation condition, intubation time, first-pass rate, and the incidence of intubation-related complications were compared.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: