Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:45 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:03 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05760794
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-12-02
First Post:
2023-02-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Barbed-suture Efficiency Study for Sacrocolpopexy
Sponsor:
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
BEST: Barbed-suture Efficiency Study for Sacrocolpopexy
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
BEST
Brief Summary:
Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) performed laparoscopically or with robotic assistance is associated with improved patient-centered outcomes such as faster recovery times, less pain, less bleeding, and shorter hospital stay, however at the expense of longer operating times. One of the time consuming parts of the procedure is vaginal mesh attachment.
Detailed Description:
The purpose of this research study is to compare two different suture types that are used to attach vaginal mesh that is typically used in women undergoing robotic or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (attachment of the vagina to the sacral promontory). The barbed suture is one continuous suture, while the delayed absorbable suture involves placing individual sutures and tying a knot for each. All women will have permanent sutures that attach the mesh to the sacral promontory, which is standard of care. The goal is to determine if the barbed delayed absorbable suture decreases the time of vaginal mesh attachment.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: