Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:45 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 5:22 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01083394
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2014-03-10
First Post:
2010-02-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon and Conventional Balloon for In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery
Sponsor:
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon or Conventional Balloon for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery in Patients With Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease (ISAR-PEBIS)
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2010-04
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
ISAR-PEBIS
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to perform a randomized, controlled trial to compare percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using paclitaxel eluting balloon (PEB) or using a conventional balloon for treatment of superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis.
Detailed Description:
The superficial femoral artery is a common place for arteriosclerosis in patients symptomatic for lower extremity vascular disease. Advances in percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting have provided new options for the treatment of the disease in this arterial segment. Restenosis after PTA occurs in 40-60% within one year. A novel attempt to reduce restenosis is the use of paclitaxel eluting balloons (PEB). First clinical studies suggest that the use of PEBs during percutaneous treatment of femoropopliteal disease is associated with significant reductions in late lumen loss and target-lesion revascularization. There is no randomized comparison of these treatments in patients with in stent restenosis of the superficial femoral artery. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of PTA with conventional balloon or PEB for in stent restenosis in the SFA in terms of reduction of diameter stenosis at follow-up angiogram.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: