Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:38 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-07 @ 4:42 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05923294
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-08-13
First Post:
2023-06-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions
Sponsor:
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Clinical Comparison of Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the root coverage rate of the gingival unit-shaped connective tissue graft, obtained by intraoral de-epithelization, with the traditional de-epithelialized free gingival graft in localized recessions of anterior and premolar teeth. In addition, it is aimed to compare the postoperative gingival thickness between the two techniques. The secondary aim is to search the effects of both techniques on periodontal parameters and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: