Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:35 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 11:49 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04377594
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-12-10
First Post:
2020-04-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Ablation of Fibrotic Areas in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Sponsor:
Karolinska University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Individually DEsigned Ablation of Low Voltage Areas in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
IDEAL-AF
Brief Summary:
Brief summary: The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to pulmonary vein isolation or pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation of fibrotic areas.
Detailed Description:
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice with a prevalence of 2-3 percent in the population. Catheter ablation performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established treatment, which aim to eliminate triggers from the pulmonary veins. This treatment is successful in most patients with paroxysmal AF. In many patients, especially the patients with persistent AF, this treatment is not sufficiently to achieve freedom from arrhythmia and symptoms.
There are several studies showing that fibrosis in the left atrium (LA) is an independent factor to relapse in AF after PVI. The fibrotic areas can be detected by measuring the voltage in the left atrium and creating a voltage map. There are non-randomized studies that suggest better results regarding reduction of arrhythmia burden after ablating the low voltage areas (LVAs). This ablation strategy is commonly used in clinical praxis although there are no randomized studies in this field.
Aim:
The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to PVI versus PVI plus ablation of LVAs.
The primary endpoint is freedom of atrial arrhythmias after 1 to 2 ablation procedures within 6 months measured at 12 months after the first ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs. Secondary endpoints will be atrial arrhythmia burden, health related quality of life measured by AFEQT score, and RAND 36 and periprocedural complications; death, stroke/ TIA, tamponade, atrio-esophageal fistula, and atrioventricular block.
Study design:
Randomized controlled multicenter trial. The study will be single blinded. All the participants will undergo PVI and the substrate map will be collected during atrial pacing. The patients with LVA will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to; PVI plus ablation of LVA or PVI alone. Follow up visits will be at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Before ablation and at every follow up visit the participants will fill in arrhythmia symptom specific questionnaires (AFEQT and ASTA) and questionnaire about quality of life (RAND 36). The participants will register arrhythmia with a heart monitoring system if symptoms of arrhythmia and two times daily during two weeks before every follow up visit.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice with a prevalence of 2-3 percent in the population. Catheter ablation performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established treatment, which aim to eliminate triggers from the pulmonary veins. This treatment is successful in most patients with paroxysmal AF. In many patients, especially the patients with persistent AF, this treatment is not sufficiently to achieve freedom from arrhythmia and symptoms.
There are several studies showing that fibrosis in the left atrium (LA) is an independent factor to relapse in AF after PVI. The fibrotic areas can be detected by measuring the voltage in the left atrium and creating a voltage map. There are non-randomized studies that suggest better results regarding reduction of arrhythmia burden after ablating the low voltage areas (LVAs). This ablation strategy is commonly used in clinical praxis although there are no randomized studies in this field.
Aim:
The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to PVI versus PVI plus ablation of LVAs.
The primary endpoint is freedom of atrial arrhythmias after 1 to 2 ablation procedures within 6 months measured at 12 months after the first ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs. Secondary endpoints will be atrial arrhythmia burden, health related quality of life measured by AFEQT score, and RAND 36 and periprocedural complications; death, stroke/ TIA, tamponade, atrio-esophageal fistula, and atrioventricular block.
Study design:
Randomized controlled multicenter trial. The study will be single blinded. All the participants will undergo PVI and the substrate map will be collected during atrial pacing. The patients with LVA will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to; PVI plus ablation of LVA or PVI alone. Follow up visits will be at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Before ablation and at every follow up visit the participants will fill in arrhythmia symptom specific questionnaires (AFEQT and ASTA) and questionnaire about quality of life (RAND 36). The participants will register arrhythmia with a heart monitoring system if symptoms of arrhythmia and two times daily during two weeks before every follow up visit.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: