Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:33 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-07 @ 2:28 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04109794
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-09-30
First Post:
2019-09-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Two Techniques in Gingival Recession Treatment. One-year Clinical Follow-up Study
Sponsor:
Kırıkkale University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Two Techniques in Gingival Recession Treatment. One-year Clinical Follow-up Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
42 patients were treated either with E-CTG (N=20) or SCAF (N=22). The recordings included clinician-based (recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, tissue thickness, clinical attachment gain (CAG), root coverage (RC), keratinized tissue change (KTC)) and patient-based (wound healing index (WHI), dentine hypersensitivity (DH), tissue appearance, patient expectations and aesthetics) parameters that were taken at baseline, T1 (sixth week), T2 (sixth month) and T3 (first year).
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: