Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:32 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 11:45 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00326794
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2006-05-17
First Post:
2006-05-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Efficacy of Shoulder Mobilisation Versus Conventional Immobilisation for Nonsurgically Proximal Humerus Fracture
Sponsor:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effectiveness at 3 Months of Immediate Shoulder Mobilisation Versus Conventional Immobilisation for Impacted Nonsurgically Treated Proximal Humerus Fracture: a Randomised Controlled Trial.
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2005-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Background: Nonsurgical proximal humerus fracture is common, causing prolonged disability, for which the time to begin rehabilitation is not well determined. We assessed the feasibility and efficacy of early (within 3 days'after fracture) mobilisation of the shoulder compared with conventional 3-week immobilization followed by physiotherapy.
Detailed Description:
Methods: We randomly assigned 74 patients with impacted nonsurgically treated proximal humerus fracture to receive early passive mobilisation or conventional-treatment. The primary outcome was functional assessment of the shoulder (Constant score) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were functional assessment at 6 weeks and at 6 months, change in pain (on a visual analogue scale) and passive range of motion.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: