Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:31 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:38 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05799794
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-02-19
First Post:
2023-01-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Optimizing Implementation Coaching to Support Successful EBP Delivery
Sponsor:
University of Washington
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Optimizing Implementation Coaching to Improve Treatment Quality and Client Outcomes in Community Mental Health Centers
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This project engages community mental health center (CMHC) clinical supervisors in the development and examination of an optimized coaching strategy for psychotherapists utilizing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in Washington State. The optimized coaching strategy has the potential to enhance the adoption and fidelity of evidence-based practice (EBP).
Detailed Description:
The Washington State EBP Initiative provides clinical training and consultation for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and some basic organizational support; however, consistent with the literature, community mental health centers (CMHCs) often need more to successfully implement CBT. To accelerate treatment quality and clinical outcomes for youth, CMHCs need practical strategies for "successfully implementing, sustaining, and improving" EBPs that can be tailored to fit their specific context. These strategies will have the greatest impact if designed and delivered by CMHC practice community members who have CMHC-specific EBP implementation experience and expertise.
Implementation facilitation, a multifaceted, dynamic strategy of interactive problem-solving and support, improves adoption and fidelity of interventions. Implementation facilitation may be a promising strategy for CMHCs, but the resources and demands of traditional facilitation may present challenges for CMHCs. Motivated by global mental health frugal innovations work, the Principal Investigator piloted a modified facilitation approach for CMHCs, Implementation Coaching (hereafter "Coaching"), delivered to CMHCs participating in the Initiative. Coaching involved 4, group-based, virtual meetings with CMHC supervisors, who are frontline leaders in CMHCs. The investigator led coaching, supporting supervisors in developing workplans for CBT implementation in their CMHCs across 3 implementation phases. Coaching recommends a limited set of implementation strategies in each phase (e.g., Implementation phase: local technical assistance) that address known, prioritized determinants. Supervisors are supported in tailoring strategies for their CMHCs. In the pilot, CMHCs that received Coaching had clinicians that engaged in CBT delivery earlier and with more youth. Qualitative interviews suggested that supervisors were engaged and found Coaching acceptable and feasible. Based on the pilots' success, Project 2 will engage CMHC supervisors in: a) co-designing an optimized version of Coaching, and b) leading Coaching for other supervisors to optimize CBT implementation in their CMHCs.
In this exploratory research project, the Investigators' goal is to extend a pilot study that included the development and implementation of Implementation Coaching (hereafter "Coaching") within the Washington State EBP Initiative. In the pilot, the Coaching involved 4, group-based, virtual meetings with CMHC supervisors, who are frontline leaders in CMHCs. The results of the pilot indicated that Coaching was acceptable and feasible. In the current study, in collaboration with CMHC supervisors, investigators aim to optimize and test the effectiveness of Coaching for improving CBT fidelity and youth outcomes for four common conditions in CMHCs. The hypothesized mechanism through which Coaching operates is implementation climate or the degree to which an organization expects, supports, and rewards an innovation. Investigators expect that Coaching can be most effective in supporting CMHCs' high-quality EBP implementation if optimized with the practice community (supervisors) for the goals of limited resource use, fit with CMHC workflow, and wider reach. Coaching reach can be improved by moving beyond delivery by University-based personnel. In the Initiative, peer CMHC supervisors with CBT experience and expertise already co-lead CBT clinical training.
The study includes the following aims: Aim 1a) Collaborating with CMHCs, investigators will identify and convene purposively sampled groups of supervisors for diverse perspectives and demographics (e.g., ethnically diverse supervisors/clientele; urban/rural) during 2 one-day, in-person Ideation workshops; Aim 1b) Up to 150 clinicians will be recruited through the Initiative listserv and CBT+ training (for clinicians who recently completed their training) to participate in an online study in which clinicians will be randomized to read up to 6 vignettes that describe different strategies developed in the ideation phase and complete a survey with relevant subscale/s of implementation climate (EBP use is expected, supported and rewarded); Aim 2) Clinicians will be randomly assigned to receive standard implementation support or standard implementation support plus Coaching by trained supervisors.
Implementation facilitation, a multifaceted, dynamic strategy of interactive problem-solving and support, improves adoption and fidelity of interventions. Implementation facilitation may be a promising strategy for CMHCs, but the resources and demands of traditional facilitation may present challenges for CMHCs. Motivated by global mental health frugal innovations work, the Principal Investigator piloted a modified facilitation approach for CMHCs, Implementation Coaching (hereafter "Coaching"), delivered to CMHCs participating in the Initiative. Coaching involved 4, group-based, virtual meetings with CMHC supervisors, who are frontline leaders in CMHCs. The investigator led coaching, supporting supervisors in developing workplans for CBT implementation in their CMHCs across 3 implementation phases. Coaching recommends a limited set of implementation strategies in each phase (e.g., Implementation phase: local technical assistance) that address known, prioritized determinants. Supervisors are supported in tailoring strategies for their CMHCs. In the pilot, CMHCs that received Coaching had clinicians that engaged in CBT delivery earlier and with more youth. Qualitative interviews suggested that supervisors were engaged and found Coaching acceptable and feasible. Based on the pilots' success, Project 2 will engage CMHC supervisors in: a) co-designing an optimized version of Coaching, and b) leading Coaching for other supervisors to optimize CBT implementation in their CMHCs.
In this exploratory research project, the Investigators' goal is to extend a pilot study that included the development and implementation of Implementation Coaching (hereafter "Coaching") within the Washington State EBP Initiative. In the pilot, the Coaching involved 4, group-based, virtual meetings with CMHC supervisors, who are frontline leaders in CMHCs. The results of the pilot indicated that Coaching was acceptable and feasible. In the current study, in collaboration with CMHC supervisors, investigators aim to optimize and test the effectiveness of Coaching for improving CBT fidelity and youth outcomes for four common conditions in CMHCs. The hypothesized mechanism through which Coaching operates is implementation climate or the degree to which an organization expects, supports, and rewards an innovation. Investigators expect that Coaching can be most effective in supporting CMHCs' high-quality EBP implementation if optimized with the practice community (supervisors) for the goals of limited resource use, fit with CMHC workflow, and wider reach. Coaching reach can be improved by moving beyond delivery by University-based personnel. In the Initiative, peer CMHC supervisors with CBT experience and expertise already co-lead CBT clinical training.
The study includes the following aims: Aim 1a) Collaborating with CMHCs, investigators will identify and convene purposively sampled groups of supervisors for diverse perspectives and demographics (e.g., ethnically diverse supervisors/clientele; urban/rural) during 2 one-day, in-person Ideation workshops; Aim 1b) Up to 150 clinicians will be recruited through the Initiative listserv and CBT+ training (for clinicians who recently completed their training) to participate in an online study in which clinicians will be randomized to read up to 6 vignettes that describe different strategies developed in the ideation phase and complete a survey with relevant subscale/s of implementation climate (EBP use is expected, supported and rewarded); Aim 2) Clinicians will be randomly assigned to receive standard implementation support or standard implementation support plus Coaching by trained supervisors.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1P50MH126219 | NIH | None | https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… | View |