Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:28 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 11:40 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07302594
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-12-24
First Post:
2025-12-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effects of Oro-esophageal Tubes on Swallowing Function in Ischemic Stroke Survivors
Sponsor:
Zeng Changhao
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effects of Oro-esophageal Versus Nasogastric Tubes on Swallowing Function in Ischemic Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is an open-label randomized controlled trial. The participants are ischemic stroke patients requiring enteral nutrition. The study is conducted in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Neurology.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding versus Nasogastric Tube Feeding on participants' swallowing function and airway protection.
Specifically, the study aims to answer the following two key questions:
Is there any difference between the two feeding methods in terms of their effects on swallowing function? Are the safety profiles of the two feeding methods consistent? Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status, extubation of tracheostomy tube, pulmonary infection, neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer.
Participants will be divided into two groups randomly, with different nutritional support respectively.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding versus Nasogastric Tube Feeding on participants' swallowing function and airway protection.
Specifically, the study aims to answer the following two key questions:
Is there any difference between the two feeding methods in terms of their effects on swallowing function? Are the safety profiles of the two feeding methods consistent? Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status, extubation of tracheostomy tube, pulmonary infection, neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer.
Participants will be divided into two groups randomly, with different nutritional support respectively.
Detailed Description:
This is a two-arm open-label randomized controlled trial. The participants are dysphagic ischemic stroke patients requiring enteral nutrition. The study is conducted in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Neurology.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding versus Nasogastric Tube Feeding on participants' swallowing function and airway protection.
Specifically, the study aims to answer the following two key questions:
Is there any difference between the two feeding methods in terms of their effects on swallowing function? Are the safety profiles of the two feeding methods consistent? Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status, extubation of tracheostomy tube, pulmonary infection, neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding versus Nasogastric Tube Feeding on participants' swallowing function and airway protection.
Specifically, the study aims to answer the following two key questions:
Is there any difference between the two feeding methods in terms of their effects on swallowing function? Are the safety profiles of the two feeding methods consistent? Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status, extubation of tracheostomy tube, pulmonary infection, neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: