Viewing Study NCT03845595


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:12 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-02-27 @ 6:49 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03845595
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-02-19
First Post: 2019-02-09
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Cortical Excitability Sequential Changes in Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Post Stroke
Sponsor: Cairo University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: The Sequential Rate of Change in Cortical Excitability in Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Patients
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study was conducted to investigate the cortical excitability changes per session in response to the application of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation \*LF-rTMS\* on the contralesional hemisphere and its impact upon the upper limb motor performance post stroke. As well as, the minimum and maximum number of (LF-rTMS) sessions that would be recommended to achieve boosted enhancement in the cortical excitability findings and subsequently its impact upon the functional performance of the upper limb in stroke patients.Half of the patients were treated with the contralesional (LF-rTMS) in addition to conventional upper limb physical therapy interventions, while the other half received the conventional upper limb physical therapy interventions.
Detailed Description: Forty first ever ischemic stroke patients (3 to 6 months) were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups. Intervention for the study group consisted of 10 therapeutic( LF- rTMS) sessions, applied daily for two consecutive weeks in addition to their conventional upper limb physical therapy program. 1-hertz \*HZ\* stimulation was delivered at 90% of the contralesional Active Motor Threshold \*cAMT\* for 20 minutes over the contralesional motor' hot spot'. Sequential cortical excitability changes were examined by recording the contralesional Active Motor Threshold \*cAMT\* and the ipsilesional Active Motor Threshold \*iAMT\* at the end of every session for all patients in both groups throughout the 10 therapeutic consecutive sessions, While the sequential cortical excitability rate of change was measured by calculating the difference in the sessional values of (cAMT and iAMT) between two successive recordings throughout the 10 therapeutic consecutive sessions. Active motor threshold was assessed by the visible election of the contralateral first dorsal interosseous \*FDI\*. Upper limb motor performance was assessed using the Fugal-Myer Assessment Upper Extremity scale \*FMA-UE\* and hand grip dynamometer before and after the whole treatment protocol for all patients in both groups. All the forty patients had successfully accomplished the study procedures. The post treatment findings for cortical excitability and upper limb motor performance declared considerable difference between both groups. It was concluded that Four sessions is the recommended minimal number of (LF-rTMS) sessions that revealed highest significant difference in cortical excitability findings between both groups, relying on both the sessional findings of (cAMT) and the sessional findings of (iAMT). Also, The maximum recommended number of the inhibitory (rTMS) sessions that showed boosted enhancement in cortical excitability in relation to the control group was Eight sessions after which there was a plateau in the findings of the sequential rate of change either for the (cAMT) or the (iAMT) findings. Recovery of the upper limb motor function is closely related to the regain of cortical interhemispheric balance in stroke patients. Further research is needed to reveal whether the sequential changes in cortical excitability is correlated to the stroke onset or the degree of the general motor impairment post stroke. Also, further studies are recommended to figure out whether the recovery of the upper limb motor function is related to implemented number of inhibitory (rTMS) sessions.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: