Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:26 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 6:10 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01584193
Status:
WITHDRAWN
Last Update Posted:
2018-10-23
First Post:
2012-04-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Venous Access Port Implantation
Sponsor:
University of Lausanne Hospitals
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Totally Implantable Venous Access Port Implementation: a Single-center Controlled Randomized Superiority Trial
Status:
WITHDRAWN
Status Verified Date:
2018-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Logistical reasons (institutional reorganization of ambulatory surgery)
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare two different surgical techniques for implementation of totally implantable central venous access ports. Ultrasound-guided suclavian vein puncture is compared to cephalic vein dissection.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: