Viewing Study NCT04047693


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 1:25 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-27 @ 11:25 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04047693
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2022-02-18
First Post: 2019-08-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Neoadjuvant Dose Dense MVAC in MIBC and Locally Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Sponsor: Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Dose Dense MVAC Followed by Radical Surgery in Patients With MIBC and Locally Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder: Phase II, Single-arm Study
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2022-02
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of four cycles of ddMVAC with G-CSF support in patients with MIBC and locally advanced UC
Detailed Description: * Currently, most treatment guidelines including NCCN recommend a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) as a standard of care in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
* Although standard NAC regimen is controversial due to rare of head to head study between each regimens, cisplatin based multidrug combination regimens such as MVAC, GP, and dose dense MVAC (ddMVAC) with G-CSF supports are regarded as a backbone treatment on the basis of the results from previous studies.
* Application of NAC is still relatively slow adoption in real practice. These slow adoption result from intuitive concerns such as significant toxicity of multidrug combination chemotherapy represented by MVAC and delayed application of radical surgical treatment in non-responder
* The ddMVAC with G-CSF support regimen showed an improved efficacy compared with GP regimen, and tolerable compared with standard MVAC using application of routine G-CSF support and high intensity of cisplatin.
* In case of clinically lymph node evolvement (cN+) is not for strict NAC, but patient with cN+ UC have been treated induction chemotherapy of similar NAC regimens and surgical treatment. So, this study included MIBC plus cN+ UC as locally advanced UC.
* In Korea, there is a low adoption of NAC, additionally rare of ddMVAC with G-CFS in locally advanced UC. It is supposed concerns related with toxicity of ddMVAC. Although the concern is likely not true considering the previous result of the Western, there has not been studied ddMVAC as NAC in Asian including Korean.
* The objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of four cycles of ddMVAC with G-CSF support in patients with locally advanced UC.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: