Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:25 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-09 @ 4:43 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03772093
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-12-11
First Post:
2018-12-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Effectiveness of Short-term Massage Versus Trabert Current Therapy in Patients With Low Back Pain
Sponsor:
Medical University of Bialystok
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Effectiveness of Short-term Massage Versus Trabert Current Therapy in Patients With Low Back Pain
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is still a frequent health problem. Recurrance of symptoms leads to high absence at work. It was proved in previous studies that low back manual massage has a significant impact on pain reduction. Trabert current (TC) is common physical modality used in rehabilitation of patients with LBP. The aim of study was to assess the effectiveness of manual massage in comparison to TC in patients with LBP.
Methods: Sixty patients with LBP were enrolled in to the study. In all patients discopathy and spondyloarthrosis were diagnosed. The subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: massage (I=30) and TC (II=30) therapy. The procedures were performed for ten days. Pain intensity was assessed by Numerical Rating Scale. Quality of life and the degree of disability were evaluated by Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Results: In both groups pain reduction and functional improvement were observed after therapy. However, better results were noticed in group I.
Methods: Sixty patients with LBP were enrolled in to the study. In all patients discopathy and spondyloarthrosis were diagnosed. The subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: massage (I=30) and TC (II=30) therapy. The procedures were performed for ten days. Pain intensity was assessed by Numerical Rating Scale. Quality of life and the degree of disability were evaluated by Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Results: In both groups pain reduction and functional improvement were observed after therapy. However, better results were noticed in group I.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: