Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:12 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:11 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06267495
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-02-20
First Post:
2024-02-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Epithelium-on Cross-linking Versus Observation of Fellow Eyes of Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus
Sponsor:
Assiut University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Epithelium-on Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking Versus Observation of Fellow Eyes of Young Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral asymmetric progressive corneal degenerative disease. The management of young patients, diagnosed with clinically evident KC in one eye and with no clinical signs of KC in the other eye, represents a real challenge for many ophthalmologists.
The aim of the current study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of epithelium-on accelerated CXL to stabilize the eye with no clinical signs of KC, in young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, compared with standard care and follow-up only.
The aim of the current study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of epithelium-on accelerated CXL to stabilize the eye with no clinical signs of KC, in young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, compared with standard care and follow-up only.
Detailed Description:
Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral asymmetric progressive corneal degenerative disease associated with corneal thinning and protrusion with resultant irregular astigmatism and visual loss.
Although several studies showed that epithelium-off corneal cross-linking (epi-off CXL) is more effective in preventing KC progression compared with epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the removal of corneal epithelium in epi-off CXL might be associated with a number of serious complications such as persistent epithelial defects and sight-threatening infectious keratitis. Additionally, recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis concluded that epi-on CXL is as effective as epi-off CXL in terms of visual and topographic stability of keratoconus, but has the advantage of being much safer avoiding the complications of epithelial removal.
The management of the better eye, of young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, is controversial. Some ophthalmologists prefer to cross-link the better eye, while others prefer to conservatively follow it up, in order to avoid complications of epithelial removal in epi-off CXL.
Although several studies showed that epithelium-off corneal cross-linking (epi-off CXL) is more effective in preventing KC progression compared with epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the removal of corneal epithelium in epi-off CXL might be associated with a number of serious complications such as persistent epithelial defects and sight-threatening infectious keratitis. Additionally, recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis concluded that epi-on CXL is as effective as epi-off CXL in terms of visual and topographic stability of keratoconus, but has the advantage of being much safer avoiding the complications of epithelial removal.
The management of the better eye, of young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, is controversial. Some ophthalmologists prefer to cross-link the better eye, while others prefer to conservatively follow it up, in order to avoid complications of epithelial removal in epi-off CXL.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: