Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:43 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:43 PM
NCT ID:
NCT05492851
Brief Summary:
This study is a 3-arm, double-blind, randomized trial comparing the clinical outcomes of Zilretta, Synvisc One, and Monovisc for knee OA.
Detailed Description:
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability worldwide.1,2 Standard of care treatments for knee OA include activity modification, weight loss, therapeutic exercise and medications like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). If these measures fail, injections like corticosteroids and hyaluronate (HA) can be helpful for pain control.3
The aforementioned injections have unique mechanisms of action. Steroid injections work through reducing joint inflammation, while HA works by lubricating and cushioning the joint. There are several varieties of steroids and HA injections that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in knee OA.
Among these variations are extended-release triamcinolone (Zilretta), hylan GF-20 (synvisc one), and hyaluronan (monovisc). While each are FDA approved and commonly used in orthopedic and sports medicine clinics, they have never been directly compared in any study. Therefore, when selecting a treatment for a patient, it is largely based on provider preference, not clinical data.
This study is a 3-arm, double-blind, randomized trial comparing the clinical outcomes of Zilretta, Synvisc One, and Monovisc for knee OA.
Study:
NCT05492851
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT05492851