Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:36 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:36 PM
NCT ID:
NCT07057895
Brief Summary:
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic consistency between the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) for identifying malnutrition in patients with pancreatic malignant tumors. The goal is to determine if the GLIM criteria, a newer and more streamlined tool, shows substantial agreement with the well-established PG-SGA, thereby supporting its use in this high-risk clinical population.
Detailed Description:
Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy often associated with severe nutritional decline. While the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) is used for initial screening and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a recognized standard for detailed nutritional assessment, the PG-SGA can be time-consuming. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria were developed to provide a globally harmonized, two-step framework for diagnosing malnutrition. This prospective observational study was designed to compare the performance of GLIM criteria against the PG-SGA in patients with pancreatic cancer. Patients admitted to the hospital were screened with NRS 2002. Those at nutritional risk (NRS 2002 ≥ 3) were then comprehensively assessed using both PG-SGA and GLIM criteria. The study hypothesis is that the GLIM criteria and PG-SGA will demonstrate good consistency in diagnosing malnutrition in this population, validating GLIM as a practical and reliable assessment tool in clinical settings.
Study:
NCT07057895
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT07057895