Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:04 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:04 PM
NCT ID:
NCT04187235
Brief Summary:
This is a non-randomised case-controlled prospective study of consecutive patients with parastomal hernia, comparing the laparoscopic Keyhole repair with the modified Sugarbaker repair.
Detailed Description:
Objective: To compare the laparoscopic Keyhole repair with the modified Sugarbaker repair in a nonrandomised case-controlled prospective study of consecutive patients with parastomal hernia.
Summary Background Data: Two reviews of uncontrolled studies concluded that the Sugarbaker repair is superior to the Keyhole repair. The present study challenges the claim.
Methods: In two time periods 135 patients with a parastomal hernia were repaired with the Keyhole technique (74 patients, using a two-layer mesh of polypropylene and ePTFE with a self-cut slit, 1997- 2009) or the Sugarbaker technique (61 patients, using a coated polypropylene mesh, 2009-2015). The patients in the two groups matched with regard to age, gender, ASA score, colostomy or ileostomy hernia, previous repairs, size of fascial defect and simultaneous repair of a concurrent incisional hernia. Observation time was defined as time to recurrence, stoma re-siting, mesh removal, death, or last non-event visit
Study:
NCT04187235
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT04187235