Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:24 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:24 PM
NCT ID:
NCT04494932
Brief Summary:
One of the common complaints after SLAP repair is pain and stiffness. However, the more recently-described Biceps Tenodesis for SLAP tears improves upon this by addressing the long head of biceps which is thought to be the pain sources. However, only one small prior RCT has evaluated this, finding minimal difference. Both procedures are currently considered standard of care, and are decided upon based on patient and surgeon preference.
This will be a single-center randomized controlled trial. The study is comparing SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis in patients under 30 undergoing surgery for SLAP tears. The purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate the effect of SLAP repair versus biceps tenodesis in the management of SLAP tears in patients under 30 years old.
Detailed Description:
Superior-labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears were first described by Andrews et al. in 1985, and have been reported to be present in up to 26% of shoulder arthroscopies. While the exact cause of SLAP tears is unknown, they are often related to traumatic events and sports activity, particularly overhead sports such as baseball. Type II SLAP tears, which are characterized by superior labral fraying with a detached biceps anchor, are the most common subtype, based on the classification by Snyder et al. Treatment options include SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis, biceps tenotomy, and debridement.
One of the common complaints after SLAP repair is pain and stiffness. However, the more recently-described Biceps Tenodesis for SLAP tears improves upon this by addressing the long head of biceps which is thought to be the pain sources. However, only one small prior RCT has evaluated this, finding minimal difference. Both procedures are currently considered standard of care, and are decided upon based on patient and surgeon preference.
This will be a single-center randomized controlled trial. The study is comparing SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis in patients under 30 undergoing surgery for SLAP tears. The purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate the effect of SLAP repair versus biceps tenodesis in the management of SLAP tears in patients under 30 years old.
Study:
NCT04494932
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT04494932