Description Module

Description Module

The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.

Description Module path is as follows:

Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module

Description Module


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 9:18 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-24 @ 9:18 PM
NCT ID: NCT02412904
Brief Summary: rFSH and HMG are both used to controlled ovarian stimulation for patients submitted to IVF. However, there is a debate in the literature which one is better to induce ovulation in patients receiving GnRH antagonist to block premature Luteinizing Hormone (LH) secretion. The investigators propose a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to investigate the differences among recombinant FSH and HMG in patients submitted to IVF using GnRH antagonists.
Detailed Description: To compare embryonic quality and other clinical outcomes when using human menopause gonadotropin (hMG) or recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) to the ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles with the GnRH antagonist protocol. Design: open randomized single center study with infertile patients submitted to IVF comparing IVF outcomes between hMG and rFSH when controlled with GnRH antagonist. Setting: A single private center of reproductive medicine in association with Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Patients: Infertile women with normal ovarian reserve with IVF indication. Intervention: The patients were randomized in two groups, 85 received rFSH and 83 received hMG to ovulation induction, both groups used GnRH antagonist to prevent ovulation. Main Outcome Measure: Total embryonic score and best embryonic score. Secondary outcomes: Total dose of gonadotropins, number and size of follicles in the end of the stimulation, number of mature oocytes, number of embryos, pregnancy rates.
Study: NCT02412904
Study Brief:
Protocol Section: NCT02412904