Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:23 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:23 PM
NCT ID:
NCT07024303
Brief Summary:
The overall objective is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two common treatments for CB in children and adolescents with autism using multiple outcome measures. Our central hypothesis is that both behavioral treatment and medication will produce reductions in CB, but behavioral treatments, including behavior treatment + medication, will produce a greater reduction in CB when measured using direct observation within the contexts most associated with challenging behavior. We have four aims: Aim 1: Evaluate the concordance between indirect and direct measures of challenging behavior. We hypothesize that behavior change (% change) will be discordant between indirect and direct measurement data, regardless of treatment type, with direct measurement resulting in significantly greater change at each measurement timepoint. Aim 2: Compare the efficacy of psychotropic medication, behavior therapy, and combination therapy (medication+behavior therapy) on CB using indirect measures (ABC-I, BPI, CGI, MOSES) and direct observation (antecedent analysis). We hypothesize that all treatment modalities will reduce CB on both outcome measures at each standard timepoint, but behavioral therapy and combination therapy will produce a significantly greater reduction on direct observation of CB in the contexts most associated with challenging behavior. Aim 3: Compare the social validity of psychotropic medication, behavior therapy, and combination therapy using the Treatment Acceptability Rating Form-Revised (Reimers et al., 1992). Aim 4: Compare the social validity of measurement methods (indirect vs. direct).
Detailed Description:
Our overall objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two common treatments for CB in children and adolescents with autism using multiple outcome measures. Our central hypothesis is that behavioral treatment, medication, and combination treatment (medication+behavior therapy) will produce reductions in CB, but behavioral treatment and combination treatment will produce a greater reduction in CB when measured using direct observation within the contexts most associated with challenging behavior.
To address this objective, we plan to recruit up to 20 individuals under 13 years of age who are diagnosed with autism and exhibit challenging behavior to participate in this study. Subjects will be recruited from clinics where patients receive consultation on medication for challenging behavior. Subjects will be given the options of initiating/continuing medication, initiating behavior therapy, both medication and behavior therapy, or neither medication nor behavior therapy. The behavioral treatment provided as part of the research study will be functional communication training or FCT. FCT is a scientifically validated behavior therapy that involves teaching the child to use communication (in various forms) instead of challenging behavior to get what they want. It will be delivered at a timing (1 time per week) and dosage (60 minutes per visit) that is common for individuals with challenging behavior. Subjects will participate in a baseline behavioral assessment (baseline), as well as monthly behavioral assessments. Each behavioral assessment will include indirect (rating scales) and direct (antecedent analysis) measures of challenging behavior, as well as measures of social validity (treatment acceptability rating scales). Subjects will be followed for 6 months and comparisons of behavior change across measures will be used to determine treatment effectiveness and concordance between measures.
Study:
NCT07024303
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT07024303