Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:20 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:20 PM
NCT ID:
NCT07417618
Brief Summary:
Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale emulation of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.
Detailed Description:
This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the Randomized Controlled Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT-DUPLICATE) initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits of the modern incretin therapies semaglutide and tirzepatide in selected populations. SUSTAIN-6 (NCT01720446) and SURPASS-CVOT (NCT04255433) showed reductions in cardiovascular events with semaglutide and tirzepatide among patients with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk, findings that were also replicated in clinical practice settings (NCT06659744, NCT07088718).1-3 The REWIND trial (NCT01394952) demonstrated similar cardiovascular efficacy for dulaglutide and suggested benefit in both patients with and without prior cardiovascular disease.4 These findings raise the broader question of whether cardiovascular benefits of modern incretin therapies extend to individuals without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) when used in routine clinical practice.
To address this question, this comparative effectiveness study using a target trial emulation framework will assess the incretin therapies dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin (used as an active comparator placebo proxy) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and overweight with or without ASCVD.
Although many features of the target trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, measurements of key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were designed to proxy those features from the target trial. Randomization cannot be achieved in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice.
The database analyses will be new-user active-comparative studies, conducted using 3 national United States claims databases, where we compare the effect of dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide vs sitagliptin on preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular events.
Study:
NCT07417618
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT07417618