Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:17 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:17 PM
NCT ID:
NCT07489469
Brief Summary:
This randomized study compares AI-generated clinical documentation with traditional dictation templates during orthopedic consultations. Patients are randomized to have their consultation documented using either an AI medical scribe or a routine dictation template. Outcomes include surgeon documentation time, administrative processing time, time from consultation to note delivery to the family physician, patient satisfaction, and documentation accuracy.
Detailed Description:
Clinical documentation is a necessary but time-consuming component of surgical practice. Traditional documentation relies on dictation templates that require manual transcription and editing by administrative staff. Artificial intelligence (AI) medical scribes have been developed to automate documentation by recording and transcribing consultations in real time.
The purpose of this randomized study is to compare the effectiveness of an AI scribe versus routine dictation templates in orthopedic consultations.
Patients undergoing consultation for total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, or meniscal pathology will be invited to participate. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either AI-generated documentation or standard dictation template documentation. Consultations will otherwise occur according to usual clinical practice.
Data collected will include:
* Surgeon documentation time per patient encounter
* Administrative processing time
* Time from consultation to delivery of the consultation note to the family physician
* Patient satisfaction, including comfort with documentation methods and perceived usefulness of timely note availability
* Documentation accuracy, including spelling, grammar, completeness, and clinical correctness assessed by a blinded reviewer A total of 200 participants will be enrolled. Outcomes will be compared between groups using appropriate statistical tests with a significance level of p \< 0.05.
Study:
NCT07489469
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT07489469