Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:37 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:37 AM
NCT ID:
NCT02559102
Brief Summary:
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal anaesthesia, and general sevoflurane anaesthesia with caudal anaesthesia for inguinal herniotomies in neonates and infants below 3 months of age.
The investigators will compare the efficacy and adverse events associated with each of these techniques and neurodevelopmental outcomes of the infants in each group at 6 months and 2 years of age.
Detailed Description:
Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that children exposed to general anaesthesia (GA) in early childhood may be at increased risk of subsequent learning disabilities and behavioural problems. Animal studies have shown that exposure to GA agents during critical neuro-developmental windows induces neuronal apoptosis. All commonly used anaesthetic agents induce neurotoxicity with the exception of dexmedetomidine, a highly specific alpha-2 agonist which has been shown to be neuroprotective.
GA is the current standard of care for inguinal hernia repair in infants at KKH. The investigators recently demonstrated that dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block is a feasible alternative for inguinal hernia repair in infants below 3 months of age. This prospective randomized controlled trial will compare the early and long-term outcomes of infants following inguinal hernia surgery using dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block versus GA with caudal block.
This study aims:
1. To compare the neurodevelopment at 6 months and 2years, of infants randomized to dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block with those randomized to GA with caudal block for inguinal hernia surgery before 3 months of age.
2. To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block versus GA with caudal block for inguinal hernia surgery, in terms of duration of anaesthesia, duration of surgery and surgeon's satisfaction with intraoperative conditions.
Study:
NCT02559102
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT02559102